Important Judgement Writing Questions for Judiciary Exams 2023

Reader's Digest - Are you eager to tackle the judgment writing section of the Judiciary Exams 2023 with confidence? Dive into our blog, where we explore judgement writing questions along with tips & insights to elevate your skills!

Are you gearing up for the judiciary exams 2023? If yes, then you must have heard the most common phrase that echoes in the hallways of every law student's heart - "Judgement writing is the key to crack the judiciary exams."

But, have you ever wondered what makes a judgement writing stand out from the rest? What are the best tips for judgment writing? Here the important judgment writing questions for judiciary exams:

• How to communicate your thoughts effectively in a judgement? Clear and effective communication is key to writing a good judgement. 
• How to ensure impartiality and fairness in judgement writing? Avoid personal opinions and biases, and ensure that the decision is based solely on the facts and law of the case. Scroll below to learn more!
• What is the structure of a judgement? A well-structured judgement typically includes an introduction, statement of facts, analysis of the law and facts, conclusion, and the order or decree. But, that's not all! 

Download FREE Study Material for Judiciary Exams by Judiciary Gold

How to Structure Judgement Writing Questions for Judiciary Exams?

Here is the table on the structure of the judgement writing questions for upcoming judiciary exams:

Section	Description
Introduction	Briefly introduce the case, parties involved, and main issues to be addressed.
Facts of the Case	Present a clear and concise summary of the relevant facts without including unnecessary details.
Issues to be Determined	List and explain the legal issues and questions that need to be resolved in the judgment.
Relevant Law	Discuss the applicable laws, statutes, and legal principles that pertain to the issues at hand.
Analysis	Apply the relevant law to the facts of the case, and analyze the legal implications.
Decision	State your decision, clearly indicating which party prevails and the reasons for your conclusion.
Remedies (if applicable)	Specify the appropriate remedies, relief, or penalties to be awarded based on the decision.

How to Attempt Judgement Writing Questions in Judiciary Exams 2023?

Most aspirants preparing for the judicial services exam often ask for the best Preparation Tips for Judgment Writing. 

To ease your preparation, we have developed smart tricks and tips that help you better understand how to attempt Judgment writing questions for Judiciary Exams.

• Judgment Writing is like a Mathematics problem that involves step marking.
• Hence, sticking to a proper format of a court's judgment and attempting each stage of the assessment will exponentially increase your marks.
• Avoid the temptation to use technical Legal Jargon or vocabulary.
• Try to use simple language that anyone can understand.
• While attempting the question, diligently read all the facts given and mark the critical points to ensure that you do not miss out on them.
• Prepare a rough format of the judgment by taking out a minute not to skip any vital piece of information.

Tips to Attempt Judgement Writing Questions in Judiciary Exams 2023

Here is the table on tips to attempt judgement writing questions in Judiciary Exams:

Aspect	Description
Legible Handwriting	Ensure that your handwriting is clear and easy to read to allow examiners to follow your arguments.
Structure and Organization	Organize your answer with headings, subheadings, and a logical flow to make it easy to understand.
Crisp and Concise Language	Use precise language and avoid verbosity to convey your points effectively and efficiently.
Use of Legal Terminology	Incorporate appropriate legal terms and concepts to showcase your knowledge and understanding.
Accuracy of Legal Principles	Accurately state and apply relevant laws, statutes, and case law to demonstrate your expertise.
Critical Analysis	Analyze the facts and issues from different perspectives, considering both sides of the argument.
Well-reasoned Conclusion	Provide a clear and concise conclusion, explaining the rationale behind your decision.
Time Management	Allocate sufficient time to each question to ensure that you complete the entire exam.

Important Judgment Writing Questions for Judicial Services Exams 2023

To help you get an idea about the type of questions asked from this topic, we have provided a few essential questions curated from the previous year's Question Papers for Judiciary Exams.

Question 1:

"A" lives in one of the residential houses of the HEL colony, Bhopal. On 1-5-2017 after taking his meals at 10:00 pm in night 'A' after locking his house left for attending a marriage function in a neighbouring colony.

'A' returned to his house at 3:00 a.m. When he came to the house he saw that someone had broken the lock and from inside the house, his new hero bicycle frame no H.5394 is taken away. 'A' rushed to the police station and lodged F.I.R Sub Inspector B investigated the offence.

During the investigation, B came to know that C on the date of the incident on midnight D was seen in the nearby house of A. D was taken into custody and B prepared a memorandum and got it signed by accused D and witnesses E and F. Hero bicycle has been recovered from the house of D in the presence of D and witnesses E and F by B. Seizure memo was prepared and the bicycle was sent to the executive magistrate for identification.

IP was held and A identified the bicycle. Police filed a police report and the court after framing charges tried the case.

Defence:

Accused has taken the defence that he had inimical terms with A and therefore A has falsely implicated him.

Evidence of Prosecution:

1. A deposed the fact of housebreaking and theft of his bicycle. He deposed the fact of IP and its memo. Cross-examination NIL.

2. E and F were produced to prove seizure and memo but they did not support the prosecution and were declared hostile and were cross-examined by the prosecution. They admit their signature in the memo and seizure, and they also admitted that because of the threat given by the accused they are not supporting the prosecution.

3. Witness C disposed of that he saw the accused on a relevant day at mid-night near the house of A. Cross-examination NIL.

4. B deposed the fact regarding memo, seizure, and investigation. In cross-examination, he denied the suggestion of false implication by A.

5. Executive magistrate 'G' deposed the fact of IP and the identification memo of the recovered bicycle. Cross-examination NIL.

Evidence of Accused: NIL

Arguments:

Prosecutor argued that from evidence charges against the accused are proved.

The defence argued that E and F were independent witnesses but they did not support the prosecution in spite that if the accused is held guilty, he being a student of 19 years should be allowed benefit under probation law because this is his first offence and his conduct expects the case has always remained good.

Judgement Writing Format Sample

Refer to the format of judgement writing question for PCS J preparation:

Section	Sample Format
Introduction	"In the case between Plaintiff A and Defendant B, the primary dispute involves..."
Facts of the Case	"The relevant facts of the case are as follows: On Date X, Event Y occurred, leading to..."
Issues to be Determined	"The main legal issues to be resolved in this case are: 1) Issue 1, 2) Issue 2, and 3) Issue 3."
Relevant Law	"The applicable laws and legal principles governing this case include: Law 1, Statute 2, and..."
Analysis	"Applying Law 1 to the facts, it is clear that Party A is liable for..., as demonstrated by..."
Decision	"Based on the analysis, the court finds in favor of Party A/B due to the reasons outlined above."
Remedies (if applicable)	"As a result of the decision, Party A/B is entitled to Remedy 1 and/or Penalty 2."

Read More - Personal Interview Preparation Tips for Judiciary Exams 2023

Judiciary Mains Topper Answer Sheet

Here is an example of the judiciary Mains topper answer sheet:

Question: Analyze the legality of a contract entered into by two parties, where one party was under duress at the time of signing.

Answer:

Introduction

A contract is an agreement between two or more parties that creates legal obligations, enforceable by law. In the present case, we will discuss the impact of duress on the legality of a contract.

Facts of the Case

Party A and Party B entered into a contract. At the time of signing, Party A was under duress exerted by Party B, compelling Party A to sign the contract against their will.

Issues to be Determined

1. Does the presence of duress render the contract void or voidable?
2. What remedies are available to the aggrieved party in this case?

Relevant Law

Section 19 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, states that a contract becomes voidable if consent is obtained through coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, or undue influence.

Analysis

In the given case, Party A's consent was obtained through duress, which can be considered as coercion under Section 15 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Consequently, the contract is voidable at the option of Party A, the aggrieved party. Party A may choose to either rescind the contract or continue with it.

Decision

Based on the analysis, the contract between Party A and Party B is voidable due to the presence of duress at the time of signing. Party A has the option to either rescind the contract or continue with it.

Remedies

If Party A chooses to rescind the contract, they may seek restitution for any benefits conferred under the contract. Additionally, Party A may also claim damages for any losses suffered as a result of the contract.

Conclusion

In conclusion, writing a good judgement for Judiciary Exam is an important aspect of judiciary exams, and requires a deep understanding of the law, analytical skills, and effective communication. By keeping these important questions in mind, you can improve your judgement writing skills and increase your chances of success in judiciary exams.