Landmark Judgement Questions For CLAT PG 2025 Preparation

Overview: Preparing for CLAT PG requires different study approaches for each section. One key area to focus on is recent and landmark judgments.

This article provides the best methods to study these judgments and offers important questions based on landmark judgments for CLAT PG 2025. Let's begin!

Looking for more details on the exam? Check out CLAT PG Notification 2025 page! 

Download Free CLAT PG Study Material by LEAC ⬇️

Looking For Important Judgments? Stay Updated, Download Now!

How to Identify Important Recent Judgments for CLAT PG 2025?

To get ready for the CLAT PG exam, you need a good strategy, especially for studying recent judgments. Here are some tips to help you pick the key landmark judgments for CLAT PG 2025 exam:

Tips to Identify Important Recent Judgments for CLAT PG 2025

• Focus on Relevant Judgments:

  • Not every recent judgment is important for the exam. It’s crucial to discern which judgments are significant and which are not.
  • Understanding what not to study is equally important to avoid wasting time on irrelevant information.

• Consider the Bench Size:

  • Generally, judgments made by constitution benches of three or more judges are considered more significant.
  • Single or two-judge bench judgments are usually less important, though there are exceptions based on the context of the judgment.

• Relate Judgments to the Syllabus:

  • Prioritize recent judgments that are related to key subjects in the syllabus such as Constitutional law, family law, and criminal law.
  • These areas are more likely to feature in landmark judgement questions for CLAT PG 2025.

• Exclude Irrelevant Topics:

  • Judgments on topics like arbitration law and the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) are less likely to be included in the exam as they are not central to the syllabus.
  • Focus your study time on areas that are directly relevant to the exam syllabus.

• Seek Guidance:

  • Utilize the expertise of mentors, teachers, and peers to identify significant judgments.
  • This can save you time and ensure you are focusing on the most important material.

Take Free CLAT PG 2025 Preparation Demo Class Here!

Practical Application

To effectively prepare for landmark judgement questions for CLAT PG 2025, integrate these tips into your study routine:

• Create a list of recent judgments and classify them based on their relevance to the exam syllabus.
• Regularly review and update your list as new judgments are filed and as you get closer to the exam date.
• Join study groups or forums where you can discuss and clarify doubts about which judgments are essential for the exam.

By strategically selecting and studying important recent judgments, you can enhance your preparation for the CLAT PG 2025 and perform better on exam day.

Read Prep Guide: CLAT PG 2025 Constitutional Law Guide

Access all previous CLAT PG papers here for download! ⬇️

List of Landmark Judgements for CLAT PG 2025 

Preparing for the CLAT PG exam requires a deep understanding of significant judicial decisions. Here is a detailed list of essential landmark judgments that are crucial for your CLAT PG 2025 preparation.

These judgments not only help in grasping the nuances of our legal system but also enhance your ability to tackle landmark judgement questions for CLAT PG.

Key Landmark Judgments

• Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum (1985)

  • Significance: Extended Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code to provide maintenance to a divorced Muslim woman.

• C. Mehta v. Union of India (1986)

  • Significance: Established the principle of absolute liability, holding industries strictly liable for harm caused by their activities.

• Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka (1992)

  • Significance: Affirmed that the right to education is an integral part of the right to life under Article 21.

• Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)

  • Significance: Upheld the implementation of the Mandal Commission Report, defined the “creamy layer,” and established that reservations could not exceed 50% of the total available seats.

• R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)

  • Significance: Set guidelines to prevent the misuse of Article 356 related to President’s Rule.

• Rajgopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (1994)

  • Significance: Declared that the right to privacy is implicit in the right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21, establishing the ‘right to be let alone.’

Read: Important Constitutional Law Questions for the CLAT PG exam

• Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995)

  • Significance: Addressed the issue of solemnizing a second marriage by converting to Islam without dissolving the first marriage, highlighting the need for a uniform civil code.

• Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan (1997)

  • Significance: Defined sexual harassment at the workplace and formulated the Vishakha guidelines to address such issues.

• Samatha v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1997)

  • Significance: Prohibited leasing government, tribal, and forest land in scheduled areas to non-tribals or private companies for mining or industrial operations.

• Chairman, Railway Board v. Chandrima Das (2000)

  • Significance: Extended the right to life to non-citizens visiting India for tourism or other purposes.

• A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra (2005)

  • Significance: Ruled that the state cannot enforce reservation policies or quotas in private educational institutions.

• Om Prakash v. Dil Bahar (2005)

  • Significance: Held that a rape accused could be convicted based solely on the victim's testimony, even if medical evidence did not prove rape.

• Trimex International Ltd v. Vedanta Aluminium Ltd (2010)

  • Significance: Held that a concluded contract, whether orally or in writing, remains valid even if a formal contract has not been prepared.

• Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India (2011)

  • Significance: Issued guidelines permitting passive euthanasia under specific conditions.

• Lily Thomas v. Union of India (2013)

  • Significance: Ruled that elected representatives convicted of crimes with a sentence exceeding two years would be disqualified from office on the date of conviction.

• People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2013)

  • Significance: Directed the Election Commission to include a ‘None of the Above’ (NOTA) option on EVMs and ballot papers.

• Supreme Court Advocates on Record v. Union of India (2015)

  • Significance: Declared the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act and the 99th Constitutional Amendment unconstitutional and void.

• NALSA v. Union of India

  • Significance: Recognized the constitutional rights and freedom of transgender individuals, affirming them as the third gender.

• Shreya Singhal v. Union of India

  • Significance: Struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act as unconstitutional, protecting freedom of speech and expression.

For your preparation, focusing on these landmark judgments is essential. They not only form the basis for many landmark judgement questions for CLAT PG but also provide a comprehensive understanding of significant legal principles.

Read Detailed Guide: How to Prepare for CLAT PG 2025?

Download 25 Important Constitution Judgements For CLAT PG 2025

Analysis of Past Year Trends in CLAT PG Landmark Judgments 

In dissecting the patterns and tendencies from the CLAT PG 2025 examination, there are several observations that can serve as a beacon for candidates preparing for future exams.

Here's a detailed breakdown of the trends noted in landmark judgement questions For CLAT PG:

• Prevalence of Classic Cases Over Recent Ones:

  • Examination of previous papers indicates a strong inclination towards asking about landmark judgments that have stood the test of time rather than recent rulings.
  • For example, candidates might find questions on seminal cases like Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala over more contemporary ones.

• Variation in Question Types:

  • The papers have shown a mix of straightforward questions requiring direct recall of facts and more nuanced ones that need the application of legal principles.
  • An instance of this would be a direct question on the significance of the Indira Sawhney case versus a complex problem-solving question that applies the principles from this case to a hypothetical scenario.

• Diverse Difficulty Levels:

  • The difficulty spectrum ranged from easy definitional questions to challenging ones that require in-depth analysis.
  • For instance, a relatively simple question might ask for the year a particular case was judged, whereas a more difficult one could require an understanding of the intricate legal implications of the judgment.

• A shift from Contemporary Issues:

  • There was a noticeable drift from current legal happenings to a focus on historical and foundational legal cases and principles.
  • This shift suggests that while current affairs are important, a robust understanding of landmark cases like M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (which introduced the concept of absolute liability) is indispensable.

• Emphasis on Core Legal Principles:

  • The pattern underscores the need for a solid grasp of basic legal concepts, as many questions are framed around the application of these principles.
  • For example, questions might center on the application of the basic structure doctrine, first established in the landmark case of Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala.

• Broad Spectrum of Legal Domains:

  • Even though some areas like Family Law were underrepresented, questions spanned a wide range of legal fields, suggesting a comprehensive approach to studying.
  • A question might focus on Public Interest Litigation (PIL), drawing from cases such as S.P. Gupta v. Union of India, which emphasized the importance of PIL in the Indian legal system.

• Strategic Selection of Topics:

  • Some topics are perennial favourites in the CLAT PG exam, indicating the necessity for aspirants to pay special attention to them.
  • For example, the principle of "basic structure" of the Constitution has been a recurring theme, and questions related to the landmark case that established this principle are often included.

Read: Which Law School to Choose for PG Courses This Year

Download CPC Practice Sheets for CLAT PG ⬇️

Questions Based on Landmark Judgement for CLAT PG 2025 

We have provided a few sample questions for your reference to help you understand the type of landmark judgement questions For CLAT PG 2025.

These landmark judgement questions For CLAT PG 2025 are curated from the previous year's question papers for the CLAT PG exam.

Q) In which landmark case does the Supreme Court hold that the Second marriage of a Hindu man is invalid even if he converts to Islam before marriage?

a. Daniel Latiffi vs Union of India

b. Sarla Mudgal vs. Union of India

c. Roopa Hurrah vs. Ashok Hurrah.

d. Ramchandra Saraswati vs Neena Bajpai

Ans. Option B

Q) In which landmark case does the Supreme Court of India hold that the power of judicial review vested in the High Court under Art.226 and the right to move the Supreme Court under Art.32 is an integral and essential feature of the Constitution?

a. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India

b.Sajjan Singh v. the State of Rajasthan

c. Keshavnanada Bharti vs Union of India

d. Sheela Barse v. Union of India

Ans. Option A

Q) In which Landmark case were fundamental rights considered Inviolable parts of the Indian Constitution?

a. Golak Nath vs the State of Punjab

 b. Keshavnanada Bharti vs Union of India

c. S.R Bommai V. Union of India

d. Prem Singh v. the State of Haryana

Ans. Option A

Check: Best Books for CLAT PG 2025

Q) In which Landmark legal case does the Supreme Court hold that Parliament has the right to amend the Fundamental Rights enshrined in the Constitution?

a. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan
b. Minera Mills v. Union of India
c. Bachan Singh vs State of Punjab
d. Shankari Prasad v. Union of India

Ans. Option D

Q) In which landmark legal case was it held that the preamble is not a part of the Indian Constitution?

a. Berubari Union(I), Re

b. Keshavnanada Bharti v. State of Kerala

c. S.R Bommai v. Union of India

d. T.M.A Pai v. Union of India

Ans. Option A

Q) Which of the following case decided by the Supreme Court is related to ‘mental cruelty'

a. Rooplal v Kartaro

b. Sayal v Sarla

c. Dastane v Dastane

d. None of the above

Ans. Option D

Q) Muhammad Afzal v Ghulam Kasim (1903) ILR 843 is a leading case on which of the following?

a. Doctrine of election

b. The doctrine of holding over

c. The rule against perpetuity

d. None of the above

Ans. Option a

Q) S.R. Bommai v Union of India, JT 1994 (2) SC 215 is related to

a. President Rule in State under Article 356

b. National Emergency under Article 352

c. Financial Emergency

d. None of the above

Check: Eligibility criteria for CLAT PG exam

Ans. Option a

Q) The NJAC Act was declared unconstitutional in

a. Sakal Chand v Union of India

b. S P Gupta v Union of India

c. SC Adv on Record Association v Union of India

d. In re Presidential reference of 1998

Q) The case relating to Parliamentary Privileges is

a. Keshav Singh v Speaker of The UP Assembly

b. Maneka Gandhi v Union of India

c. Minerva Mills v Union of India

d. A K Gopalan v Union of India

Ans. Option a

Q) The case of Unnikrishnan v State of Andhra Pradesh deals with which of the following rights?

a. Right to Education

b. Right to go abroad

c. Right to Privacy

d. None of the above

Ans. Option a

Q) The case of the State of Bihar v Kameshwar Singh is related to which of the following doctrines?

a. Doctrine of Eclipse

b. The doctrine of Basic Structure

c. The doctrine of Colourable Legislation

d. The doctrine of Pith and Substance

Ans. Option c

Q) Principle of Vicarious Liability was the first time decided in the case of

a. R v Tolson

b. R v Huggins

c. R v Stephenson

d. R v Prince

Ans. Option b

Read: Comprehensive MCQ test series for CLAT PG exam

Q) The case of KM Nanavati v State of Maharashtra is related to

a. Dacoity

b. Grave and Sudden Provocation

c. Theft

d. Abatement

Ans. Option b

Q) The case of R v Dudley and Stephen is related to the defence of

a. Necessity

b. Insanity

c. Mistake of fact

d. None of the above

Ans. Option b

Q) Dhulabhai v State of MP is related to which of the following under CPC?

a. Interim Orders

b. Jurisdiction of Civil Court

c. First Appeals

d. Pleadings

Ans. Option b

Read: List of jobs after CLAT PG

Download IPC Practice Questions for CLAT PG ⬇️

Key Takeaways

• Focus on Relevant Judgments: Prioritize studying judgments related to Constitutional law, family law, and criminal law.

• Bench Size Matters: Judgments by constitution benches (three or more judges) are usually more significant.
• Stay Updated: Regularly update your list of important judgments as new cases are decided.
• Seek Guidance: Use insights from mentors and peers to identify key judgments.
• Practical Preparation: Join study groups and forums to discuss and clarify doubts.
• Understand Landmark Cases: Deep knowledge of significant cases helps in answering complex questions.
• Use Resources: Download important judgment lists and practice questions to enhance your preparation.