MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions

Reader’s Digest - Are you ready to know all the details about the MH CET law logical reasoning section? In this post, you will get all the details about the MH CET law logical reasoning section, important logical reasoning questions for MH CET Law 2024, etc. So, let's get started!

Download Frequently Asked Questions for MHCET

The Maharashtra Common Entrance Test (MH CET) Law logical reasoning subject consists of 40 multiple-choice questions (MCQs). One mark is allotted for each correct answer, and there is no negative marking for the wrong answer.

If you can understand how to solve logical reasoning questions quickly, you will save time on the exam and give yourself the best chance to score well.

This article will teach you all the important logical reasoning questions for the MH CET (Maharashtra Common Entrance Test) Law 2024.

List of Important Topics for MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions

The Logical Reasoning section for the MH CET Law 2024 consists of various topics that are mentioned below:

Statements and Assumptions	Statements and Conclusions
Statements and Agruments	Statements and Actions
Assertion-Reason	Syllogism
Number Test	Direction and Distance Test
Coding and Decoding	Blood Relationship
Analogy	Seating Arrangements
Puzzles	Cause and Effect
Course of Action	Clock and Calendars

Take Free Demo Class for Legal Reasoning

Most Important MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions

Based on the MH CET Law Exam Pattern, here is the list of questions for the logical reasoning section. 

MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions on Statements and Conclusions

Question - Direction (1 - 5): A statement is given in each of the following questions, followed by two conclusions.

Answer:

(a). If only the Conclusion I follow.

(b). If only conclusion II follows.

(c). If either I or II follows.

(d). If neither I nor II follows.

(e). If both I and II follow.

1. Statement:

The distance of 900 km by road between Bombay and Jafra will be reduced to 280 km by sea. This will lead to a saving of Rs. 7.92 crores per annum on fuel.

Conclusions:

1. Transportation by sea is cheaper than that by road. 
2. Fuel must be saved to the greatest extent. 

Answer: (b). If only conclusion II follows.

Explanation: 

According to the statement, sea transport is cheaper than road transport in the case of a route from Bombay to Jafra, but not in all cases. So, in conclusion, I do not follow. The statement stresses the saving of fuel. So, conclusion II follows. 

2. Statement:

A good voice is a natural gift, but one has to keep practising to improve and excel in music. 

Conclusion: 

1. Natural gifts need nurturing and care. 
2. Even though your voice is not good, you can keep practising. 

Answer: (a). If only the Conclusion I follow.

Explanation: 

Clearly, I follow directly from the given statement. However, II is unrelated to the given statement and does not follow.

3. Statement:

Domestic demand has been increasing faster than the production of indigenous crude oil.

Conclusions: 

1. Crude oil must be imported. 
2. Domestic demand should be reduced. 

Answer: (c). If either I or II follows.

Explanation: 

The statement mentions that oil demand is increasing faster than production. So, the demand must be reduced, or oil must be imported to cope with the increasing demand. Thus, either I or II follows.

4. Statement:

All organized people find time for rest. Sunita, despite her hectic schedule, finds time for rest. 

Conclusions: 

1. Sunita is an organized person. 
2. Sunita is an industrious person. 

Answer: (e).  If both I and II follow.

Explanation: 

Sunita has a hectic schedule. This means that she is industrious. But still, she finds time for rest. This means that she is an organized person. So, both I and II follow.

5. Statements: 

This book, 'Z', is the only book that focuses on the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980. 

Conclusions: 

1950. There was no question of poverty in India before 1950.
1951. No other book deals with poverty in India from 1950 to 1980.

Answer: (b). If only conclusion II follows.

Explanation:

The phrase 'only book' in the statement makes II implicit. However, nothing about the state of poverty before 1950 can be deduced from the statement. So, I do not follow.

Don't Miss - Logical Reasoning Preparation for the MH CET Law Exam 2024

MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions on Syllogism

Question: Direction Question: Given questions contain four arguments of three sentences each. Choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.

(1). Some bikes are mopeds. All mopeds are scooters. some bikes are scooters

(2). All children are hair. No hair is red. No children are red.

(3). No pencil is a pen. Some pens are markers. Some pencils are markers.

(4). Every man has a wife. All wives are devoted. No devoted has a husband.

(a) (1), (2), and (3)

(b) (1) and (2).

(c) (3) and (2).

(d) (1), (2), (3), and (4)

 Answer: (b) (1) and (2).

Explanation:

The first step to solving the syllogism question is to read the direction given in the question very carefully and understand the meaning of each word.

 And in this question, it is given that there are four arguments of three statements each.

And we have to choose the set in which the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two.

 Now, look at the first argument and find whether the third statement is a logical conclusion of the first two or not.

1. Some bikes are mopeds. All mopeds are scooters. some bikes are scooters

So, as we can see in the above Venn diagram, the third statement of the first argument is a logical conclusion of the first two statements, i.e. some bikes are scooters.

 So, in this case, the 1 conclusion follows.

 Now the second argument,

2. All children are hair. No hairs are red. No children are red.

As the statement says that no hairs are red and all children are hair, it is evident that if all children are hair and no hairs are red, the third statement, no children are red, follows because there is no relation between children and red also.

So, as we can see in the above Venn diagram, the third statement of the second argument is a logical conclusion of the first two statements, i.e. no children are red.

So, in this case, the 2 conclusions follow.

Now the third argument,

3. No pencil is a pen. Some pens are markers. Some pencils are markers.

As the statement says that no pencil is a pen and some pens are markers, it is evident that if no pencil is a pen. Some pens are markers so the third statement some pencils are markers does not follow because there is no relation between pencils and markers as given in the statements.

So, as we can see in the above Venn diagram, the third statement of the third argument is not a logical conclusion to the first two statements.

So, in this case, the 3 conclusions do not follow.

So, after finding the answers to all three arguments, we can use the elimination method. This method will help us to save time, and we do not have to solve the fourth argument.

 (a) So, as per the options given, we can easily eliminate the (a), (c), (d) options which have the (3) argument in their option, and the third argument does not follow so in that case, the answer will be an option (b) which says that option (1) and (2) follow which is true.

MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions on Coding and Decoding

Question: In a certain code language, the word METAL is coded as LDSZK. How will the word ZINC be written in that language?

Solution: 

M E T A L

-1 ↓ -1 ↓ -1 ↓ -1 ↓ -1 ↓

L D S Z K

Similarly,

 Z I N C

-1 ↓ -1 ↓ -1 ↓ -1 ↓

Y H M B

Note: For coding concepts, you must know about the numerical order of the alphabet, which is A to Z.

Read Now - Toppers Strategy of the MH CET Law Exam

MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions on Blood Relationship

Question: Ravi said to Pooja, "The girl playing the piano is the younger of the two sisters of the son of my mother's husband." How is the girl playing the piano related to Ravi?

(1) Daughter

(2) Sister

(3) Cousin

(4) Niece

(5) Sister-in-law

Answer: (2) Sister

Solution:

As per the information given in the question, we will make a generation tree below:

Mother - Husband | +-- Son (Ravi) | | | +-- Piano Girl (Younger Sister) | | | +-- Older Sister | +-- Other Siblings (if any)

According to the generation tree, the son of Ravi's mother's husband is Ravi himself. So, Ravi has two sisters, one of whom is a girl playing the piano. Hence, the girl playing the piano is Ravi's sister.

GET MORE QUESTIONS for MH CET Law Exam

Conclusion

We hope this blog clears all your doubts about the MH CET Law Logical Reasoning Questions. Happy Reading! Good Luck!