Logo Icon

DJS Rank 26 Shreya Mishra Interview: Topper in Delhi Judicial Services 2024

Author : Yogricha

March 6, 2025

SHARE

Overview: The journey to becoming a judicial officer is one of dedication, resilience, and a deep commitment to justice. Shreya Mishra, a law graduate from West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences (NUJS), has carved her own path, transitioning from a corporate law career to judiciary preparation. Her story is an inspiring example of how passion for justice and determination can lead to success.

Let’s dive into Shreya’s journey, motivations, and the rigorous preparation that has brought her closer to achieving her dream of becoming a judge.

Meet Shreya Mishra: A Determined Judiciary Aspirant

Born in Malda, West Bengal, Shreya currently resides in Kolkata. She completed her law degree in 2020 from NUJS, one of the top National Law Universities in India. Following graduation, she worked at a corporate law firm for a year until 2021.

However, she soon realized that her true calling was in judicial services, prompting her to leave corporate law and dedicate herself to judiciary preparation.

Since 2021, Shreya has been fully committed to cracking the judiciary exam, focusing on Hindi-speaking states such as Delhi and Rajasthan.

Join: Judiciary coaching institute in Delhi

Choosing Judiciary Over Corporate Law: A Bold Career Shift

"Being a judge is an honor and a privilege. It allows me to uphold justice impartially and serve the people."

While many NLU graduates pursue high-paying corporate jobs or litigation, Shreya’s motivation lay in the judicial system, where she could act as an impartial adjudicator rather than a legal representative for one side.

Why Judiciary Instead of Corporate Law?

Aspect Corporate Law Judiciary

  • Nature of Work Business transactions & client advocacy Fair & unbiased decision-making
  • Impact Benefits private entities Direct impact on justice
  • Job Security Performance-based Stable & prestigious
  • Satisfaction Limited to financial & legal matters Direct role in maintaining law & order

"Unlike litigation, where a lawyer fights for one party, a judge ensures justice for all."

This passion for impartial justice led her to judiciary preparation.

Understand: Delhi Judiciary Exam 2025 Pattern

Understanding Justice: Shreya’s Legal Perspective

When asked about her definition of justice, Shreya highlighted the importance of fairness, equity, and legal safeguards.

"Justice ensures that individuals whose rights are violated receive the right remedies through a fair and unbiased adjudication process."

Shreya believes that courts play a proactive role in ensuring justice through:

  • Judicial Discretion – Judges can intervene when needed.
  • Evidentiary Safeguards – Laws ensure that decisions are based on credible evidence.
  • Appellate Remedies – If injustice occurs, higher courts can correct errors.

"The law provides enough checks and balances to ensure justice is served."

Get: Delhi Civil Judge Exam Answer Key

From Corporate Law to Judiciary Preparation: Shreya’s Work Experience

Before shifting to judiciary, Shreya worked at a law firm, specializing in:

  • Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) – 6 months
  • Funds & Corporate Transactions – 6 months

Key Responsibilities in Corporate Law

  • Reviewing legal documents
  • Conducting due diligence
  • Identifying high-risk contractual clauses
  • Assisting clients in major financial transactions

While corporate law provided financial security, Shreya felt that it lacked personal fulfillment and public service, leading her to judiciary preparation.

Judiciary Exam Preparation: Subjects & Strategy

Shreya has studied all major procedural and substantive laws, including:

  • Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
  • Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • Indian Contract Act
  • Hindu & Muslim Law

Favorite Subjects:

  • Indian Evidence Act
  • Specific Relief Act

Her deep understanding of legal principles is evident in her ability to analyze complex legal doctrines.

Read: Delhi Judiciary Admit Card 2025

Tackling Legal Doctrines & Judicial Reasoning

Shreya has mastered several legal principles critical for judicial decision-making.

  • Declaratory Decrees (Section 34 – Specific Relief Act): If a plaintiff files a suit for declaration without seeking further relief, the defendant can seek rejection under Section 34.
  • Specific Relief Act – Section 4 & Penal Provisions: Specific relief applies only to civil rights, not criminal penalties.
  • Presumption of Law vs. Natural Presumption (Indian Evidence Act)

Type of Presumption Definition

  • Natural Presumption Based on common human experience (e.g., Section 114 Evidence Act)
  • Presumption of Law Defined in statutes, must be rebutted by the accused
  • Example: Section 114, Illustration (A) – Courts may presume accomplice testimony is unreliable unless corroborated.

Role of Accomplices & Evidentiary Value: Accomplice testimonies are viewed with suspicion since they may implicate others to save themselves. Landmark Case: Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor (1949) – Established limits on discovery statements.

Facing the Judiciary Interview: A Test of Legal Knowledge

During her judiciary interview, Shreya demonstrated strong conceptual clarity but identified areas for further improvement:

  • Constitutional Amendments & Legal Doctrines
  • New Criminal Laws (Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam)

Despite these challenges, her structured and logical responses impressed the panel.

Judiciary Mock Tests

Judiciary Mock Tests

Choosing Delhi & Rajasthan Judiciary Over West Bengal Judiciary

Although Shreya is from West Bengal, she opted for Delhi and Rajasthan Judiciary due to language constraints.

"Since I am not fluent in Bengali and my family roots are from Uttar Pradesh, I preferred Hindi-speaking states."

This decision reflects her strategic thinking in judiciary preparation.

Final Thoughts: Shreya’s Journey to Success

Shreya’s transition from corporate law to judiciary preparation is a testament to:

  • Dedication & Hard Work – Leaving a corporate job for judiciary requires courage and determination.
  • Conceptual Clarity – Her strong grip on procedural and substantive laws is evident.
  • Balanced Legal Thinking – She values justice over advocacy, making her an ideal judicial candidate.

Advice for Judiciary Aspirants

  • Build strong conceptual clarity – Judiciary exams demand deep legal understanding.
  • Revise procedural laws thoroughly – CrPC, CPC & Evidence Act are key to success.
  • Practice structured answer writing – Legal reasoning and clarity are critical.
  • Mock Interviews Matter – Helps in confidence-building & articulation.